[1]华阳,杨阳,喻渝,等.大直径铁路盾构隧道绿色低碳建造评价方法研究[J].高速铁路技术,2026,(01):11-19.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2026.01.002]
 HUA Yang,YANG Yang,YU Yu,et al.On the Evaluation Method for Green and Low-carbon Construction of Large-diameter Railway Shield Tunnels[J].HIGH SPEED RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY,2026,(01):11-19.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2026.01.002]
点击复制

大直径铁路盾构隧道绿色低碳建造评价方法研究()

《高速铁路技术》[ISSN:1674-8247/CN:51-1730/U]

卷:
期数:
2026年01期
页码:
11-19
栏目:
理论探索
出版日期:
2026-01-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Evaluation Method for Green and Low-carbon Construction of Large-diameter Railway Shield Tunnels
文章编号:
1674-8247(2026)01-0011-09
作者:
华阳杨阳喻渝余浩伟殷召念
(中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司, 成都 610031)
Author(s):
HUA Yang YANG Yang YU Yu YU Haowei YIN Zhaonian
(China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610031, China)
关键词:
大直径盾构 铁路隧道 绿色低碳建造 指标体系 评价方法
Keywords:
large-diameter shield railway tunnels green and low-carbon construction index system evaluation method
分类号:
U455.43; X731
DOI:
10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2026.01.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为解决铁路盾构隧道绿色低碳建造水平缺乏系统评价方法的问题,依托南京枢纽上元门隧道工程,构建科学的评价体系并开展适用方法验证研究。通过梳理大直径铁路盾构隧道施工特性与绿色低碳要求,构建包含目标层、准则层、指标层的三级绿色低碳建造评价指标体系,并明确各指标分级判定标准; 采用改进的组合赋权策略,提升指标权重科学性; 选择灰度评价模型,构建隧道绿色低碳建造评价方法,结合工程实际监测数据实现定量化评价。研究结果表明,(1)构建的指标体系可全面覆盖大直径铁路盾构隧道绿色低碳建造关键影响因素;(2)改进的AHP+熵权法组合赋权法有效规避单一赋权局限性,结果更贴合工程实际;(3)灰度评价模型在该类工程评价中具备良好适用性,可准确量化绿色低碳水平;(4)南京枢纽上元门过江隧道绿色低碳建造预评价等级基本符合工程绿色低碳建设目标,验证了评价体系与模型的实际应用价值。本文研究可为大直径铁路盾构隧道绿色低碳建造评价提供理论支撑与实践参考。
Abstract:
To address the lack of a systematic evaluation method for assessing the level of green and low-carbon construction in railway shield tunnels, based on the Shangyuanmen Yangtze River Railway Tunnel in Nanjing Hub, a scientific evaluation system was established and its applicability was verified. By analyzing the construction characteristics of large-diameter railway shield tunnels and the requirements for green and low-carbon practices, a three-level evaluation index system was developed, consisting of a target layer, a criterion layer, and an indicator layer, with clear classification criteria defined for each indicator. An improved combined weighting strategy was adopted to enhance the scientific basis of the index weights. A grey evaluation model was selected to formulate the evaluation method for green and low-carbon tunnel construction, enabling quantitative assessment using actual monitoring data from the project. The results indicate that:(1)The established index system comprehensively covers the key influencing factors for green and low-carbon construction of large-diameter railway shield tunnels.(2)The improved weighting method, integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)and the entropy weight method, effectively overcomes the limitations of single weighting approaches and aligns more closely with practical engineering conditions.(3)The grey evaluation model demonstrates good applicability in this type of project evaluation, enabling accurate quantification of the green and low-carbon performance.(4)The pre-assessment rating for the green and low-carbon construction of the Shangyuanmen Tunnel in the Nanjing Hub generally aligns with the project's green and low-carbon objectives, verifying the practical value of the evaluation system and model. This research provides theoretical support and practical reference for evaluating green and low-carbon construction in large-diameter railway shield tunnels.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘江伟. 双碳经济视角下的铁路选线思考[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2024, 68(10): 48-54.
LIU Jiangwei. Reflections on Railway Route Selection from the Perspective of Dual-carbon Economy[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2024, 68(10): 48-54.
[2] 谢毅, 徐骏. 数智时代铁路勘察设计高质量发展转型新实践[J]. 高速铁路技术, 2025, 16(6): 1-8.
XIE Yi, XU Jun. New Practices in the High-quality Development and Transformation of Railway Survey and Design in the Digital-intelligent Era[J]. High Speed Railway Technology, 2025, 16(6): 1-8.
[3] ZHANG Yuejun, JIANG Lin, SHI Wei. Exploring the Growth-adjusted Energy-emission Efficiency of Transportation Industry in China[J]. Energy Economics, 2020, 90: 104873.
[4] 郭春, 郭亚林, 陈政. 交通隧道工程碳排放核算及研究进展分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2023, 60(1): 1-10.
GUO Chun, GUO Yalin, CHEN Zheng. Carbon Emission Accounting and Research Progress Analysis of Traffic Tunnel Engineering[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2023, 60(1): 1-10.
[5] 田四明, 吴克非, 黎旭. 铁路隧道高质量发展创新研究与实践[J]. 中国铁路, 2024(6): 48-56.
TIAN Siming, WU Kefei, LI Xu. Innovative Study on and Practice for High-quality Development of Railway Tunnels[J]. Chinese Railways, 2024(6): 48-56.
[6] 罗圆, 张可军, 寇峻瑜. 复杂山区铁路智能选线方案评价方法研究及软件开发[J]. 高速铁路技术, 2025, 16(6): 30-35.
LUO Yuan, ZHANG Kejun, KOU Junyu. Research on Evaluation Method and Software Development of Intelligent Railway Route Selection Scheme in Complex Mountainous Areas[J]. High Speed Railway Technology, 2025, 16(6): 30-35.
[7] 陈鑫磊, 张学民, 陈进, 等. 基于碳排放评价的超小净距隧道绿色施工优化研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(1): 59-70.
CHEN Xinlei, ZHANG Xuemin, CHEN Jin, et al. Green Construction Optimization of Ultrasmall Clearance Tunnel Based on Carbon Emission Evaluation[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(1): 59-70.
[8] 金文良, 李宏钧, 彭英俊, 等. 深中通道岛隧工程绿色建造技术探索[J]. 公路, 2023, 68(10): 256-263.
JIN Wenliang, LI Hongjun, PENG Yingjun, et al. Explorations on Green Construction Technology of the Island and Tunnel Project of the Shenzhen-Zhongshan Link[J]. Highway, 2023, 68(10): 256-263.
[9] 吕刚, 刘建友, 于晨昀, 等. 铁路隧道绿色低碳建造技术工程实践与展望 [J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2024, 44(4): 633-642.
LV Gang, LIU Jianyou, YU Chenyun, et al. Practice and Prospect of Green and Low-carbon Construction Technology for Railway Tunnels[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2024, 44(4): 633-642.
[10] 刘建友, 陈慧, 刘夏润. 苏州东综合交通枢纽设计理念及科研创新支撑[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2025, 69(10): 9-16.
LIU Jianyou, CHEN Hui, LIU Xiarun. Design Concept and Scientific Research Innovation Support of Suzhou East Comprehensive Transportation Hub[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2025, 69(10): 9-16.
[11] GUSTAVSSON L, JOELSSON A, SATHRE R. Life Cycle Primary Energy Use and Carbon Emission of an Eight-storey Wood-framed Apartment Building[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2010, 42(2): 230-242.
[12] CHANG B, KENDALL A. Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Assessment of Infrastructure Construction for California's High-speed Rail System[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2011, 16(6): 429-434.
[13] GUO Chun, XU Jianfeng, YANG Lu, et al. Life Cycle Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of a Highway Tunnel: a Case Study in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 211: 972-980.
[14] XU Jianfeng, GUO Chun, CHEN Xiaofeng, et al. Emission Transition of Greenhouse Gases with the Surrounding Rock Weakened—a Case Study of Tunnel Construction[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 209: 169-179.
[15] 郭春, 徐建峰, 张佳鹏. 隧道建设碳排放计算方法及预测模型[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2020, 40(8): 1140-1146.
GUO Chun, XU Jianfeng, ZHANG Jiapeng. Calculation Methods and Prediction Models of Carbon Emission of Tunnel Construction[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2020, 40(8): 1140-1146.
[16] 唐娟娟, 伍军, 王孟钧, 等. 绿色铁路工程评价研究的系统回顾与指标探索[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2021, 38(9): 74-80.
TANG Juanjuan, WU Jun, WANG Mengjun, et al. System Review and Index Exploration of Evaluation Research of Green Railway Engineering[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2021, 38(9): 74-80.
[17] 王晋, 吉光, 马军. 绿色低碳公路评价指标体系与评价方法研究[J]. 公路, 2014, 59(7): 356-361.
WANG Jin, JI Guang, MA Jun. Reserch on Evalution Index System and Methods for Highway with Low Carbon Emission[J]. Highway, 2014, 59(7): 356-361.
[18] 蒋振雄, 薛鹏, 马欣, 等. 绿色隧道评价体系研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2022, 42(4): 586-593.
JIANG Zhenxiong, XUE Peng, MA Xin, et al. Evaluation System of Green Highway Tunnels[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2022, 42(4): 586-593.
[19] 张正一, 王朝辉, 张廉, 等. 中国绿色公路建设与评估技术[J]. 长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 38(5): 76-86.
ZHANG Zhengyi, WANG Chaohui, ZHANG Lian, et al. Construction and Assessment Technology of Green Road in China[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 38(5): 76-86.
[20] 李海文, 鲍学英. 青藏高原地区铁路隧道绿色施工水平综合评价[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2021, 18(2): 524-532.
LI Haiwen, BAO Xueying. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Green Construction Level of Railway Tunnels in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2021, 18(2): 524-532.
[21] 吴元金, 刘永胜, 尹龙, 等. 基于灰色聚类的铁路隧道工程建造过程低碳评价研究[J]. 西安理工大学学报, 2023, 39(3): 353-359.
WU Yuanjin, LIU Yongsheng, YIN Long, et al. Low Carbon Assessment on Railroad Tunnel Project Construction Process by the Grey Clustering Method[J]. Journal of Xi'an University of Technology, 2023, 39(3): 353-359.
[22] 靳春玲, 安祥, 贡力, 等. 基于G2-CRITIC-UMT模型的铁路隧道低碳施工评价研究[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2025, 69(1): 139-146.
JIN Chunling, AN Xiang, GONG Li, et al. Research on Low-carbon Construction Evaluation of Railway Tunnels Based on G2-CRITIC-UMT Model[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2025, 69(1): 139-146.
[23] 粟月欢, 张宇, 段华波, 等. 地铁建设环境影响评估及减排效益研究: 以深圳市为例[J]. 环境工程, 2022, 40(5): 184-192, 236.
SU Yuehuan, ZHANG Yu, DUAN Huabo, et al. Research on Environmental Impact Assessment and Emission Reduction Potential of Metro Construction: a Case Study in Shenzhen, China[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2022, 40(5): 184-192, 236.
[24] LIU Quanlong, QIU Zunxiang, LI Ma, et al. Evaluation and Empirical Research on Green Mine Construction in Coal Industry Based on the AHP-SPA Model[J]. Resources Policy, 2023, 82: 103503.
[25] 雷杨, 吴元金, 姜仁贵, 等. 铁路隧道工程建造过程低碳评价系统研究[J]. 施工技术(中英文), 2024, 53(13): 147-152.
LEI Yang, WU Yuanjin, JIANG Rengui, et al. Research on Low Carbon Evaluation System for Railway Tunnel Construction Process[J]. Construction Technology, 2024, 53(13): 147-152.
[26] 代洪波, 季玉国. 我国大直径盾构隧道数据统计及综合技术现状与展望[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2022, 42(5): 757-783.
DAI Hongbo, JI Yuguo. Statistical Analysis of Chinese Large-diameter Shield Tunnel and State-of-art and Prospective of Comprehensive Technologies[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2022, 42(5): 757-783.
[27] 李巍.目标导向层次分析方法及其应用研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2019.
LI Wei. Study on the Method and Application of Targets-oriented Analytic Hierarchy Process [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2019.
[28] GB/T 50640 - 2023建筑与市政工程绿色施工评价标准[S].
GB/T 50640 - 2023 Green Construction Evaluation Standards for Buildings and Municipal Engineering[S].
[29] GB/T 50378 - 2019绿色建筑评价标准[S].
GB/T 50378 - 2019 Assessment Standard for Green Building[S].
[30] T/CECS 1075 - 2022 装配式建筑绿色建造评价标准[S].
T/CECS 1075 - 2022 Standard for Evaluation of Green Construction of Prefabricated Buildings[S].
[31] T/CECS 1453-2023 绿色城市隧道评价标准[S].
T/CECS 1453-2023 Standard for Evaluation of Green Urban Tunnel [S].
[32] T/CECS 1751 - 2024铁路工程绿色设计评价实施导则[S].
T/CECS 1751 - 2024 Implementation Guide for Evaluation of Green Design of Railway Engineering [S].

相似文献/References:

[1]周超,赵思为,赵文龙,等.西渝高速铁路沿线断层大地电磁勘探研究[J].高速铁路技术,2023,14(01):97.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2023.01.018]
 ZHOU Chao,ZHAO Siwei,ZHAO Wenlong,et al.A Study on Magnetotelluric Prospecting for Faults along Xi’an-Chongqing High-speed Railway[J].HIGH SPEED RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY,2023,14(01):97.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2023.01.018]
[2]王闯,齐春,胖涛,等.成渝中线高速铁路大直径盾构隧道轨下结构预制方案研究[J].高速铁路技术,2025,16(01):98.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2025.01.016]
 WANG Chuang QI Chun PANG Tao LIU Jinsong.Research on Prefabrication Schemes for Sub-rail Structure of Large-diameter Shield Tunnel of Middle Line of Chengdu-Chongqing High-speed Railway[J].HIGH SPEED RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY,2025,16(01):98.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2025.01.016]
[3]张翔.高速铁路大直径盾构隧道下穿高等级公路桥梁影响研究[J].高速铁路技术,2025,16(05):46.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2025.05.007]
 ZHANG Xiang.On the Influence of Large-diameter Shield Tunneling for High-speed Railway Under-passing High-grade Highway Bridges[J].HIGH SPEED RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY,2025,16(01):46.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2025.05.007]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2025-12-09
作者简介:华阳(1991-),男,高级工程师。
基金项目:江苏省铁路集团科技开发项目(JSRG2025ZGC190); 中国中铁股份有限公司科技研究开发计划项目(2023-重大-06,策源地2025-专项-02,2025-重点-07); 中国中铁股份有限公司科技研究开发计划项目(2023-重大-06)
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-01-30