[1]袁宇航,薛小强,吕 龙,等.冲刷作用对考虑轨道约束的连续梁桥纵向地震响应影响分析[J].高速铁路技术,2024,15(05):8-15.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2024.05.002]
 YUAN Yuhang,XUE Xiaoqiang,LV Long,et al.Analysis of Scour Impact on Longitudinal Seismic Responses of Continuously Girder Railway Bridges Considering Track Constraints[J].HIGH SPEED RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY,2024,15(05):8-15.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2024.05.002]
点击复制

冲刷作用对考虑轨道约束的连续梁桥纵向地震响应影响分析()
分享到:

《高速铁路技术》[ISSN:1674-8247/CN:51-1730/U]

卷:
15卷
期数:
2024年05期
页码:
8-15
栏目:
理论探索
出版日期:
2024-10-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of Scour Impact on Longitudinal Seismic Responses of Continuously Girder Railway Bridges Considering Track Constraints
文章编号:
1674-8247(2024)05-0008-08
作者:
袁宇航1薛小强1吕 龙1刘力维2
(1. 成都理工大学, 成都 610059;2. 中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司, 成都 610031)
Author(s):
YUAN Yuhang1XUE Xiaoqiang1LV Long1LIU Liwei2
(1. Chengdu University of Technology ,Chengdu 610059 ,China; 2. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co. ,Ltd. ,Chengdu 610031 ,China)
关键词:
铁路桥梁冲刷数值计算轨道约束地震响应
Keywords:
railway bridgescournumerical computationtrack constraintsseismic response
分类号:
U442. 5+5
DOI:
10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2024.05.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
:铁路桥因冲刷作用减弱了桩- 土间约束,增大了地震作用下的安全风险。本文以某高速铁路连续梁 桥为工程背景,利用OpenSees 建立梁- 轨一体化计算模型,研究了道床阻力系数和端刺对不同冲刷深度下 桥梁地震响应的影响,分析了轨道约束对桥梁地震响应及减震效果的影响,探讨非一致冲刷作用对桥梁地震 响应的影响。结果表明:(1)不同支座下桥梁地震响应随冲刷深度变化受道床阻力系数影响较大;端刺结构 对冲刷作用下桥梁地震响应影响较为明显;(2)轨道约束对冲刷作用下设置普通支座的桥梁地震响应影响显 著,而对设置摩擦摆式支座的桥梁地震响应影响较小;(3)桥梁减震效果随冲刷深度增加而逐渐降低,且冲刷 深度越大,轨道约束对桥梁减震效果影响越显著;(4)非一致冲刷作用下轨道约束对桥梁地震响应影响较一 致冲刷更显著。研究成果可为跨越河谷地区铁路桥抗震设计提供参考。
Abstract:
Scour actions tend to weaken the pile-soil interaction in railway bridges,amplifying seismic risk. Based on a high-speed railway continuous girder bridge,this study employed OpenSees to establish an integrated girder-track computational model,and examined the influence of ballast resistance coefficient and rail anchors on bridge seismic responses under varying scour depths. It further analyzed the effect of track constraints on bridge seismic responses and damping effectiveness,and explored the impact of non-uniform scour on bridge seismic behavior. Findings indicate:(1) The seismic response of bridges under different bearings exhibits strong dependence on the ballast resistance coefficient as scour depth varies;rail anchor structures significantly affect bridge seismic response under scour conditions.(2) Track constraints have a pronounced effect on the seismic response of bridges with conventional bearings subjected to scour,whereas their influence is less pronounced for bridges equipped with friction pendulum bearings.(3)Bridge damping efficiency decreases with increasing scour depth,and the influence of track constraints on damping becomes more substantial as scour deepens. (4)Non-uniform scour exerts a more pronounced influence on bridge seismic response compared to uniform scour under track constraints. These conclusions can serve as a reference for seismic design of railway bridges crossing river valleys.

参考文献/References:

[1] GUO Xuan, WU Yingkui, GUO Ya. Time-dependent Seismic Fragility Analysis of Bridge Systems under Scour Hazard and Earthquake Load[s J]. Engineering Structures, 2016, 121: 52 - 60.
[2] 叶爱君, 张喜刚, 刘伟岸. 河床冲刷深度变化对大型桩基桥梁地震 反应的影响[J]. 土木工程学报, 2007, 40(3): 58 - 62.
YE Aijun, ZHANG Xigang, LIU Weian. Effects of Riverbed Scouring Depth on the Seismic Response of Bridges on Pile Foundations[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2007, 40(3): 58 - 62.
[3] 李静文, 龚恋, 徐略勤, 等. 桩基冲刷对近海大跨斜拉桥地震响应 的影响分析[J]. 西华大学学报( 自然科学版), 2019, 38(5): 12 - 18, 29.
LI Jingwen, GONG Lian, XU Lueqin, et al. Effect of Pile Scouring on the Seismic Response of Large-span Offshore Cable-stayed Bridges[J]. Journal of Xihua University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 38(5): 12 - 18, 29.
[4] 刘泳钢, 吕龙. 冲刷作用对连续梁桥桩基地震响应影响[J]. 四川 建筑科学研究, 2019, 45(1): 17 - 21.
LIU Yonggang, LYU Long. Influence of the Scouring Effect on Seismic Responses of the Pile of the Continuous Girder Bridge[J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2019, 45(1): 17 - 21.
[5] GANESH PRASAD G, BANERJEE S. The Impact of Flood-induced Scour on Seismic Fragility Characteristics of Bridges[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2013, 17(6): 803 - 828.
[6] WANG Zhenghua, DUENAS-OSORIO L, PADGETT J E. Influence of Scour Effects on the Seismic Response of Reinforced Concrete Bridge[s J]. Engineering Structures, 2014, 76: 202 - 214.
[7] 饶露, 朱华中, 吴天群, 等. 山区普速铁路桥梁冲刷水害整治方案 研究[J]. 铁道建筑, 2021, 61(10): 65 - 68.
RAO Lu, ZHU Huazhong, WU Tianqun, et al. Study on Regulation Scheme of Scouring Water Damage of Ordinary Speed Railway Bridge in Mountainous Area[J]. Railway Engineering, 2021, 61(10): 65 - 68.
[8] 周外平. 铁路桥梁浅基冲刷防护方案探讨[J]. 铁路工程技术与经 济, 2020, 35(1): 33 - 35.
ZHOU Waiping. Discussion on Shallow Foundation Scour Protection Scheme of Railway Bridge[J]. Railway Engineering Technology and Economy, 2020, 35(1): 33 - 35.
[9] 靳志伟. 养畜牧铁路特大桥河段冲淤分析与冲刷计算[J]. 内蒙古 水利, 2017(5): 31 - 33.
JIN Zhiwei. Analysis and Calculation of Scouring and Silting in the Reach of Yangmu Railway Bridg[e J]. Inner Mongolia Water Resources, 201(7 5) : 31 - 33.
[10] 方理刚, 康家涛, 沈周, 等. 湘黔铁路资水大桥冲刷稳定性计算分 析[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2008, 29(1): 41 - 45. FANG Ligang, KANG Jiatao, SHEN Zhou, et al. Computational Analysis of the Scour Stability of Zishui Bridge on Xiang-Qian Railway[J]. China Railway Science, 2008, 29(1): 41 - 45.
[11] 李保龙. 通过探测基础刚度评估重载铁路简支梁桥冲刷的影响 [J]. 铁道建筑, 2019, 59(7): 12 - 16.
LI Baolong. Evaluation of Scour Inf Luence for Simply-supported Girder Bridge on Heavy Haul Railway by Detecting Foundation Stiffness[J]. Railway Engineering, 2019, 59(7): 12 - 16.
[12] 代丰, 林红松, 杨文茂, 等. 中美桥上无砟轨道设计荷载计算方法 对比研究[J]. 高速铁路技术, 2023, 14(3): 43 - 47.
DAI Feng, LIN Hongsong, YANG Wenmao, et al. Comparative Study on Calculation Methods for Design Loads of Ballastless Tracks on Bridges Based on Chinese and American Standards[J]. High Speed Railway Technology, 2023, 14(3): 43 - 47.
[13] 张永亮, 杨世杰, 陈兴冲. 基于线桥一体化模型的高速铁路桥梁地 震反应分析[J]. 桥梁建设, 2016, 46(4): 23 - 28.
ZHANG Yongliang, YANG Shijie, CHEN Xingchong. Analysis of Seismic Responses of High-speed Railway Bridges Based on Integrated Track and Bridge Model[J]. Bridge Construction, 2016, 46(4): 23 - 28.
[14] 李晓波. 减隔震支座及黏滞阻尼器减震效果分析研究[J]. 高速铁路 技术, 2021, 12(4): 34 - 38.
LI Xiaobo. Analysis of the Damping Effect of Seismic Mitigation and Isolation Bearings and Fluid Viscous Dampers[J]. High Speed Railway Technology, 2021, 12(4): 34 - 38.
[15] 黄树强, 聂细锋, 张大军, 等. 非对称铁路连续梁桥抗震设计研究 [J]. 高速铁路技术, 2023, 14(2): 38 - 42.
HUANG Shuqiang, NIE Xifeng, ZHANG Dajun, et al. A Study on the Seismic Design of Asymmetric Continuous Girder Railway Bridge[J]. High Speed Railway Technology, 2023, 14(2): 38 - 42.
[16] GB 50111 - 2006 铁路工程抗震设计规范[S]. GB 50111 - 2006 Code for Seismic Design of Railway Engineerin[g S].

相似文献/References:

[1]周川江,徐昕宇,郑晓龙,等.桥墩刚度对铁路大跨连续梁桥车桥耦合振动的影响研究[J].高速铁路技术,2022,13(06):23.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2022.06.005 ]
 ZHOU Chuanjiang,XU Xinyu,ZHENG Xiaolong,et al.Study on the Influence of Pier Stiffness on Vehicle-bridge Coupled Vibration of Long-span Continuous Girder Bridge of Railway[J].HIGH SPEED RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY,2022,13(05):23.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2022.06.005 ]
[2]温贵生.灌河特大桥连续钢桁-柔性拱主桥建造技术[J].高速铁路技术,2023,14(01):76.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2023.01.014]
 WEN Guisheng.Construction Technology of Continuous Steel Truss-flexible Arch Main Bridge of Guanhe Super Major Bridge[J].HIGH SPEED RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY,2023,14(05):76.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2023.01.014]
[3]叶丹.公路下穿施工对高速铁路桥梁墩台及行车安全影响研究[J].高速铁路技术,2024,15(03):13.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2024.03.003]
 YE Dan.Research on the Impact of Road Undercrossing Construction on the Pier Foundations and Operational Safety of High-speed Railway Bridges[J].HIGH SPEED RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY,2024,15(05):13.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2024.03.003]
[4]吕 娜,郑晓龙,金怡新,等.高速铁路桥梁导风屏障挡风效果分析与验证[J].高速铁路技术,2024,15(05):78.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2024.05.013]
 LV Na,ZHENG Xiaolong JIN Yixin,ZHANG He,et al.Analysis and Validation of Wind Shielding Effectiveness of Wind Deflectors on High-speed Railway Bridges[J].HIGH SPEED RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY,2024,15(05):78.[doi:10.12098/j.issn.1674-8247.2024.05.013]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023 -02 -20
作者简介:袁宇航(1998 -),男,硕士研究生。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金高铁联合基金项目(U1934207)
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-10-30